Why Are Mainstream Academics Writing for a Conservative Think Tank?

Why Are Mainstream Academics Writing for a Conservative Think Tank? 940 788 Safe Passage for Children of Minnesota
boy walking away down a road

Seventeen child welfare experts from places such as Harvard Law School and the Hudson Institute published  “What Child Protection is For”, a thoughtful response to the abolish child welfare movement.  It was written for the American Enterprise Institute (AEI).

The AEI has a political agenda, so we are somewhat uneasy about this arrangement.  

Perhaps the authors decided to write this piece despite the Institute’s conservative bent because sound research is being overwhelmed by ideologically-formulated practices with no empirical foundation, for example a program that falsely claims to have engaged parents in child protection voluntarily.

Child welfare intellectuals are typically liberal or moderate and publish academic articles, not opinion pieces for center-right think tanks. But if this entity offers an outlet for inconvenient truths that aren’t being presented elsewhere, perhaps making the case in that forum is better than staying silent.

Join Rich Gehrman for greater analysis on this topic in our podcast, here or wherever you hear your favorite podcast shows.

Read the podcast transcript here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nalee Vue

Would love to hear and learn more about this topic. Thank you for sharing this information!

Back to top
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Discover more from Safe Passage for Children of Minnesota

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading